My dad knows I invest in the stock market. He argues that single-family rental properties beat any investment except a successful business. In the stock market, I might wait 30 years to reach a million in retirement. In real estate, I build equity, home appreciation, and rental income. Though it takes time to pay off homes, they can pay each other off faster, like the debt snowball.
I get the concerns about maintenance, taxes, and vacancies. Dad owns 7 rental houses and rarely struggles with renters; they cover most costs. Fixing issues ensures long-term stability.
So, what’s better? Investing in rental properties or the stock market? What does the math say?
There’s no single answer. Real estate offers potential for high returns, but comes with maintenance, vacancies, and less flexibility. Stocks are easier to manage but can be volatile.
Consider a mix. Invest in the stock market for long-term growth, and if you’re up for it, use some funds for a rental property down payment. This way you get some of both worlds
Investing in stocks involves purchasing a small portion of a company and waiting for those shares to increase in value, whereas investing in real estate involves purchasing properties and renting them out or purchasing REITs (real estate investment trusts). This is the primary distinction between investing in stocks and real estate.